AR
Roadmap surface — not in MVP scopeRe-activates in Phase 5+ · Active raise: £400–600k seed, 18-month runway. Design-partner contracts anchor the round. Materials below are current — last updated this cycle.
For institutional investors, angels, and strategic operators

The compliance operating layer for offshore fiduciary.

RegAlign turns fragmented regulatory obligations into a defensible, queryable graph — obligation by obligation, control by control, evidence by evidence. Built for the jurisdictions the large GRC vendors do not serve well: Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, and FCA-served trust/fiduciary firms.

£87.5m
UK TAM

Trust/fiduciary, MLRO-served firms

£342k
Absorbed founder value

vs <£15k cash spent to date

£400–600k
Seed round

18-month runway, design-partner anchored

2
Jersey TCB slots

Design partners, 2026

Thesis

Why this, why now, why us.

Compliance as a graph, not a folder

Regulatory change → obligations → risks → controls → tests → evidence → governance. One defensible chain, queryable end-to-end.

Deterministic primary, AI secondary

Workflow state, gates and approvals are deterministic. Compass (AI) proposes and explains — it does not transition gates. Every suggestion carries rationale.

Built for the jurisdictions incumbents skip

JFSC paragraph-level traceability, Guernsey, IoM and FCA-served TCBs. The niche is too small for NavOne, too specialised for generic GRC.

Capital-efficient by construction

Single founder + AI-assisted build has shipped what an agency would quote at £342k. Seed capital extends the runway, not the burn rate.

Data room — public tier

Read the pack.

The materials below are the public tier. The full data room — financial model, customer pipeline, technical architecture, IP register — is shared under NDA after a 20-minute call.

Capital efficiency, made transparent

Founder economics — what we built without external development spend.

Single founder, AI-assisted build, sandbox-grade end-to-end product. Below is the arithmetic: founder days shipped multiplied by a blended agency day rate, against the actual cash spent. Three funding scenarios show the path forward. Every input is editable.

Absorbed founder value
£342k
360 days × £950/day
Cash spent to date
£15k
Tooling, infra, domain, legal templates
Capital-efficiency multiple
24.2×
Equivalent agency cost ÷ cash spent
Remaining build cost
£133k
140 days at £950/day
Assumptions

Edit any of these — the equivalent-agency total, runway cost and scenarios recompute live.

Headline
£357k

equivalent agency build cost — delivered for £15k of actual cash.

Capital efficiency
24.2×
Target runway cost
£504k
Funding scenarios

Three shapes. Same product, different velocity.

Lean
£250–350k
£328k
12 months runway · 8–12% dilution
Founder + 1 contract engineer

Two paying design partners, MVP hardening, no GTM hire.

Standard
Targeted
£400–600k
£504k
18 months runway · 12–18% dilution
Founder + 1 engineer + 1 compliance SME (part-time)

Five design partners, Jersey + Guernsey expansion, pen-test letter, SOC 2 Type I prep.

Accelerated
£750k–1m
£857k
24 months runway · 18–25% dilution
Founder + 2 engineers + 1 compliance SME + 1 GTM

Cross-jurisdiction GTM (UK + CD + IoM), SOC 2 Type II, partnership lane with Big 4.

Dilution bands assume a £2.5m pre-money for Lean, £3.5m for Standard, £4.5m for Accelerated. All three sit alongside the grant track (Innovate UK Smart, Jersey/Guernsey digital grants).

Equivalent agency cost is the floor, not the ceiling. The compounding asset is the product graph itself — obligations, controls, evidence, audit trail. Capital efficiency multiples for graph-shaped products are routinely 6–12× at the seed stage; we're calibrating, not boasting.

Active conversations

20 minutes, no deck, just questions.

We'd rather answer your hard ones than walk you through ours. Bring the tough question, we'll bring the data room.